Google - "Website Optimizer" vs. Multivariate testing?
I was recently reading a post about Google Website Optimizer and how they're changing the meaning of optimization. Having a background in both SEO and multivariate testing I think Google is definitely creating unnecessary confusion amongst analysts who know SEO and multivariate testing...even though Google was probably trying to make it easy for people who don't know about either.
1. They're breaking existing nomenclature in the industry by naming a multivariate testing tool an optimizer.
2. While multivariate testing strives to optimize a certain conversion event by finding the optimal web page, it harly optimizes a whole website at once...unless you sell one product or have one objective and you have 1-2 pages in your site. Therefore using website in the name s equally erroneous.
I think it's better to stay within the accepted nomenclature since their product category is not new or challenging conventions, only challenging price points.
Google is clearly trying to expand their reach in the space by using a simple name since few people are familiar with multivariate testing. And I also assume there is some hidden agenda for google to dissuade customers from SEO since it makes more room for paid search...but I always assume google has an evil plot brewing.
Optimization
Optimization
Maxymiser
love the blog, i think google have been very clever here - by calling it multivariate testing, companies already offering that would have gained from google's marketing muscle banding the word about. however, by instead calling it 'optimisation' (or optimization if you're in the US), they have made it look like they invented something new. I agree it has the downside that it will confuse people about what SEO and PPC optimisation are for.
I work for Maxymiser, a European multivariate testing and behavioural targeting company, our blog has some insight into this area and can be found at the URL location above.
Kind regards,
Alasdair
I don't find Google has